Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 671 - 680 of 9296 for jurors.

State v. Bobbie Torry
for several reasons related to jurors. The first is that two jurors already knew about the case from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5968 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Stanley Earl Applebee
failure to advise him of his right to individually poll jurors and failure to request a jury poll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11052 - 2017-09-19

State v. Bruce Sanders
thirty minutes of deliberation. However, during a polling of the jury, two jurors indicated that guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15850 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Bruce Sanders
of deliberation. However, during a polling of the jury, two jurors indicated that guilt was not their verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15850 - 2017-09-21

State v. Stanley Earl Applebee
to individually poll jurors and failure to request a jury poll constituted ineffective assistance of counsel under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11052 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 96-08 Amendment of Rules of Pleading, Practice and Procedure
(7), 975.06(1)(b), 978.05(4) and 979.05(2), (3) and (7), Stats., -- Standards Relating to Juror
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1218 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
that he is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erroneously struck a prospective juror. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52535 - 2014-09-15

State v. Patrick Neil Rucker
decided two evidentiary issues, and properly dismissed a juror for cause. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15855 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Patrick Neil Rucker
two evidentiary issues, and properly dismissed a juror for cause. We affirm. ¶2 In front
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15855 - 2017-09-21

State v. Tilford O. Thompson
several errors pertaining to the admissibility of evidence, juror bias, venue, judicial recusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11747 - 2005-03-31