Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 671 - 680 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 671 - 680 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
WI APP 195
to a speedy and public trial.” U.S. CONST. 1 Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29514 - 2014-09-15
to a speedy and public trial.” U.S. CONST. 1 Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29514 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
a reviewing court treat a circuit court's findings that a defendant did not want a speedy trial when those
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965536 - 2025-06-02
a reviewing court treat a circuit court's findings that a defendant did not want a speedy trial when those
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965536 - 2025-06-02
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
a reviewing court treat a circuit court's findings that a defendant did not want a speedy trial when those
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966348 - 2025-06-03
a reviewing court treat a circuit court's findings that a defendant did not want a speedy trial when those
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966348 - 2025-06-03
State v. George A. King
the test set forth in Echols. The trial court considered the need for efficient and speedy administration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8173 - 2005-03-31
the test set forth in Echols. The trial court considered the need for efficient and speedy administration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8173 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
a reviewing court treat a circuit court's findings that a defendant did not want a speedy trial when those
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=941244 - 2025-04-10
a reviewing court treat a circuit court's findings that a defendant did not want a speedy trial when those
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=941244 - 2025-04-10
COURT OF APPEALS
of May 17, 2009. Morris appealed, contending that he was denied his right to a speedy trial. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48740 - 2010-04-05
of May 17, 2009. Morris appealed, contending that he was denied his right to a speedy trial. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48740 - 2010-04-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
to a speedy trial. See State v. Morris, No. 00-0310-CR, unpublished slip op. ¶1 (WI App June 14, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48740 - 2014-09-15
to a speedy trial. See State v. Morris, No. 00-0310-CR, unpublished slip op. ¶1 (WI App June 14, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48740 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
John Holz v. Busy Bees Contracting, Inc.
be decided by a three-judge panel. See RULE 809.41, STATS. No. 98-1076 2 challenges the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13892 - 2014-09-15
be decided by a three-judge panel. See RULE 809.41, STATS. No. 98-1076 2 challenges the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13892 - 2014-09-15
John Holz v. Busy Bees Contracting, Inc.
“speedy and inexpensive justice” on the appellate level as well as the trial level. Were we to limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13892 - 2005-03-31
“speedy and inexpensive justice” on the appellate level as well as the trial level. Were we to limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13892 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, that he was denied his right to a speedy trial, and that he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526898 - 2022-06-01
, that he was denied his right to a speedy trial, and that he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526898 - 2022-06-01