Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6701 - 6710 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 6701 - 6710 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for sentence modification. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This is the fourth time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97212 - 2013-05-28
denying his motion for sentence modification. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This is the fourth time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97212 - 2013-05-28
COURT OF APPEALS
to Grice Engineering had not yet been paid off. On the same ground, Grice Engineering filed a joint motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54737 - 2010-09-22
to Grice Engineering had not yet been paid off. On the same ground, Grice Engineering filed a joint motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54737 - 2010-09-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
. On the same ground, Grice Engineering filed a joint motion with Liddell and Johnson to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54737 - 2014-09-15
. On the same ground, Grice Engineering filed a joint motion with Liddell and Johnson to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54737 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenneth Parrish
order denying his motion for post-commitment relief. Parrish argues that the trial court erred in: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3038 - 2005-03-31
order denying his motion for post-commitment relief. Parrish argues that the trial court erred in: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3038 - 2005-03-31
River Alliance of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
granting the Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) motion to dismiss. First, River Alliance asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6244 - 2005-03-31
granting the Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) motion to dismiss. First, River Alliance asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6244 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred by denying her motions to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial based on jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94235 - 2014-09-15
court erred by denying her motions to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial based on jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94235 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gregory A. Gibbs
and possession of drug paraphernalia.[2] After entering a plea of not guilty, Gibbs filed a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11153 - 2005-03-31
and possession of drug paraphernalia.[2] After entering a plea of not guilty, Gibbs filed a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11153 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment, but the trial court denied that motion, stating that there were genuine issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60862 - 2011-03-08
for summary judgment, but the trial court denied that motion, stating that there were genuine issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60862 - 2011-03-08
Kenneth W. Rupena v. Palmer Johnson of Racine, Inc.
The trial court initially denied both of defendant’s motions for summary judgment. After the Rupenas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4607 - 2005-03-31
The trial court initially denied both of defendant’s motions for summary judgment. After the Rupenas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4607 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court against the DOT. The joint complaint alleged that both the Wilms and Hack-A-Way “conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100523 - 2017-09-21
court against the DOT. The joint complaint alleged that both the Wilms and Hack-A-Way “conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100523 - 2017-09-21