Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6701 - 6710 of 64227 for records/1000.
Search results 6701 - 6710 of 64227 for records/1000.
State v. Calvin Matthew
, the trial court did not make an adequate record of the “strong proof of guilt” required to accept an Alford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9664 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court did not make an adequate record of the “strong proof of guilt” required to accept an Alford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9664 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110531 - 2017-09-21
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110531 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Miller
acted reasonably, and the defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2409 - 2017-09-19
acted reasonably, and the defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2409 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. No hearing is required when a defendant presents only conclusory allegations or if the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76820 - 2012-01-23
. No hearing is required when a defendant presents only conclusory allegations or if the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76820 - 2012-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP1048-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602060 - 2022-12-21
. No. 2020AP1048-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602060 - 2022-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238306 - 2019-03-27
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238306 - 2019-03-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the record. Our review of the testimony shows that Kielisch was permitted to testify about his methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28366 - 2014-09-15
to the record. Our review of the testimony shows that Kielisch was permitted to testify about his methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28366 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considering the no- merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146880 - 2017-09-21
considering the no- merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146880 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was sent a copy of the report but has not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211163 - 2018-04-12
was sent a copy of the report but has not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211163 - 2018-04-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142829 - 2017-09-21
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142829 - 2017-09-21