Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 67021 - 67030 of 83494 for case codes/1000.
Search results 67021 - 67030 of 83494 for case codes/1000.
State v. John A. Holub
case from Quartana because Holub was transported from the scene to the police station, while Quartana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2793 - 2005-03-31
case from Quartana because Holub was transported from the scene to the police station, while Quartana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2793 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The social worker assigned to Aaron’s case testified that although she saw LaShaun J. “monthly,” the social
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35929 - 2009-03-23
The social worker assigned to Aaron’s case testified that although she saw LaShaun J. “monthly,” the social
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35929 - 2009-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS
case, the State relied on Marlock’s testimony to prove a justifiable basis for the warrantless entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67144 - 2011-07-05
case, the State relied on Marlock’s testimony to prove a justifiable basis for the warrantless entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67144 - 2011-07-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830250 - 2024-07-25
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830250 - 2024-07-25
Marion Kay Smith v. Robert Joseph Smith
in each individual case determine to be relevant.” Sec. 767.255(3)(m). The division of the marital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5614 - 2005-03-31
in each individual case determine to be relevant.” Sec. 767.255(3)(m). The division of the marital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5614 - 2005-03-31
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
of the case. Per curiam opinions may not be cited for any purpose, except to support a claim of claim
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100853 - 2013-08-11
of the case. Per curiam opinions may not be cited for any purpose, except to support a claim of claim
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100853 - 2013-08-11
State v. Jerome P. Wiechert
to the case while the two were in jail together. He indicated that he told Lowery that in order to protect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11349 - 2005-03-31
to the case while the two were in jail together. He indicated that he told Lowery that in order to protect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11349 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of time.” As such, Williams argues that his violation “does not qualify as an aggravated case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84332 - 2012-07-02
of time.” As such, Williams argues that his violation “does not qualify as an aggravated case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84332 - 2012-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
purchased by Cavalry. ¶3 Cavalry filed the summons and complaint in this case on February 28, 2024
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024513 - 2025-10-16
purchased by Cavalry. ¶3 Cavalry filed the summons and complaint in this case on February 28, 2024
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024513 - 2025-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decided to resolve the case with a plea agreement. Pursuant to its terms, he pled guilty to first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099523 - 2026-04-02
decided to resolve the case with a plea agreement. Pursuant to its terms, he pled guilty to first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099523 - 2026-04-02