Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6711 - 6720 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 6711 - 6720 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. ¶4 On summary judgment, the circuit court rejected Schoolcraft and Vertz’s equal protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91014 - 2014-09-15
motion. ¶4 On summary judgment, the circuit court rejected Schoolcraft and Vertz’s equal protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91014 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment, but the trial court denied that motion, stating that there were genuine issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60862 - 2011-03-08
for summary judgment, but the trial court denied that motion, stating that there were genuine issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60862 - 2011-03-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Lauren as “husband and wife, as joint tenants.”3 Only Jason was listed on the promissory note. While
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984267 - 2025-07-23
and Lauren as “husband and wife, as joint tenants.”3 Only Jason was listed on the promissory note. While
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984267 - 2025-07-23
2006 WI App 203
and filed a summary judgment motion seeking a dismissal of Dehling’s cross-claim. The trial court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26558 - 2006-10-30
and filed a summary judgment motion seeking a dismissal of Dehling’s cross-claim. The trial court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26558 - 2006-10-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court against the DOT. The joint complaint alleged that both the Wilms and Hack-A-Way “conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100523 - 2017-09-21
court against the DOT. The joint complaint alleged that both the Wilms and Hack-A-Way “conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100523 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Henry W. Aufderhaar
Aufderhaar's motion to dismiss the criminal proceedings against him or transfer jurisdiction to the juvenile
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18924 - 2017-09-21
Aufderhaar's motion to dismiss the criminal proceedings against him or transfer jurisdiction to the juvenile
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18924 - 2017-09-21
State v. Henry W. Aufderhaar
order denying Aufderhaar's motion to dismiss the criminal proceedings against him or transfer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18924 - 2006-04-05
order denying Aufderhaar's motion to dismiss the criminal proceedings against him or transfer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18924 - 2006-04-05
Peyton A. Muehlmeier v. Linda Tuffey
of the Luedtke estate, sought dissolution of the joint enterprises. For the purpose of sound business management
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11965 - 2005-03-31
of the Luedtke estate, sought dissolution of the joint enterprises. For the purpose of sound business management
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11965 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Peyton A. Muehlmeier v. Linda Tuffey
, Luedtke’s daughter and personal representative of the Luedtke estate, sought dissolution of the joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11965 - 2014-09-15
, Luedtke’s daughter and personal representative of the Luedtke estate, sought dissolution of the joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11965 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 17, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of ...
denying his postconviction motion for relief.[1] We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 8, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101921 - 2013-09-16
denying his postconviction motion for relief.[1] We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 8, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101921 - 2013-09-16