Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6711 - 6720 of 73897 for public records.
Search results 6711 - 6720 of 73897 for public records.
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92740 - 2013-02-11
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92740 - 2013-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
replaced Attorney Hinkel as the counsel of record. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916418 - 2025-02-20
replaced Attorney Hinkel as the counsel of record. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916418 - 2025-02-20
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
prior record, the sentence imposed does not “shock public sentiment and violate the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92070 - 2014-09-15
prior record, the sentence imposed does not “shock public sentiment and violate the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92070 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158421 - 2017-09-21
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158421 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
-in offenses and Linton’s prior criminal record, the sentence imposed does not “shock public sentiment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003800 - 2025-09-03
-in offenses and Linton’s prior criminal record, the sentence imposed does not “shock public sentiment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003800 - 2025-09-03
CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99690 - 2013-07-23
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99690 - 2013-07-23
CA Blank Order
no-merit report per this court’s order.[2] After reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110218 - 2014-04-15
no-merit report per this court’s order.[2] After reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110218 - 2014-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
character including his substantial prior record, and the need to protect the public. See State v. Harris
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171603 - 2017-09-21
character including his substantial prior record, and the need to protect the public. See State v. Harris
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171603 - 2017-09-21
State v. James Arnold
of the victim’s counseling records prior to sentencing. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6723 - 2005-03-31
of the victim’s counseling records prior to sentencing. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6723 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Timothy A. Hellman
sentencing decision if the record shows the trial court reached a logical decision based on the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2725 - 2017-09-19
sentencing decision if the record shows the trial court reached a logical decision based on the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2725 - 2017-09-19