Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 67141 - 67150 of 83431 for case codes/1000.
Search results 67141 - 67150 of 83431 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Margo S. Lawinger
attempts to distinguish Michigan v. DeFillippo, 443 U.S. 31 (1979), from this case. In DeFillippo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12709 - 2017-09-21
attempts to distinguish Michigan v. DeFillippo, 443 U.S. 31 (1979), from this case. In DeFillippo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12709 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29356 - 2014-09-15
. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29356 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case No. 2018AP2196 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248687 - 2019-10-11
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case No. 2018AP2196 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248687 - 2019-10-11
[PDF]
State v. William R. Severson
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 The parties dispute some of the facts in this case. We “apply the ‘clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6029 - 2017-09-19
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 The parties dispute some of the facts in this case. We “apply the ‘clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6029 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the officer in the present case had less information regarding his intoxication than did the officer in Renz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33672 - 2014-09-15
that the officer in the present case had less information regarding his intoxication than did the officer in Renz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33672 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 We reiterate the facts of this case from our previous opinion. On August 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33902 - 2014-09-15
. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 We reiterate the facts of this case from our previous opinion. On August 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33902 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Instead he simply quotes language from a case stating that the court “must explore the child’s best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36670 - 2009-06-01
. Instead he simply quotes language from a case stating that the court “must explore the child’s best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36670 - 2009-06-01
State v. Margo S. Lawinger
U.S. 31 (1979), from this case. In DeFillippo, the police officer found the defendant and a woman who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12709 - 2005-03-31
U.S. 31 (1979), from this case. In DeFillippo, the police officer found the defendant and a woman who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12709 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or enforceable with respect to a case which is filed under Federal, Tribal, or State law and relates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=899636 - 2025-01-14
or enforceable with respect to a case which is filed under Federal, Tribal, or State law and relates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=899636 - 2025-01-14
State v. Harrison M. Marcum
the facts of this case, we conclude that Marcum demonstrated a sufficient reason for not having raised his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8065 - 2005-03-31
the facts of this case, we conclude that Marcum demonstrated a sufficient reason for not having raised his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8065 - 2005-03-31