Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 67151 - 67160 of 68579 for law.
Search results 67151 - 67160 of 68579 for law.
State v. Eddie L. Quinn
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Dodson, 219 Wis.2d 65, 69-70, 580 N.W.2d 181, 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15111 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Dodson, 219 Wis.2d 65, 69-70, 580 N.W.2d 181, 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15111 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
’ imprisonment. The sentence totaling forty years’ imprisonment is well within the range authorized by law, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93295 - 2013-02-25
’ imprisonment. The sentence totaling forty years’ imprisonment is well within the range authorized by law, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93295 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
Virginia Wustrack v. Beverly Enterprises-Wisconsin, Inc.
court misapplied the law, and we reverse. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 This is not the first time this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15021 - 2017-09-21
court misapplied the law, and we reverse. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 This is not the first time this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15021 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to Escalona as a question of law entitled to independent review). ¶10 We reject Hooker’s ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29133 - 2007-06-26
to Escalona as a question of law entitled to independent review). ¶10 We reject Hooker’s ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29133 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Vincent E. Smith
applied “an erroneous view of the law and constituted an improper exercise of discretion.” We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2571 - 2017-09-19
applied “an erroneous view of the law and constituted an improper exercise of discretion.” We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2571 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a double jeopardy violation has occurred is a question of law that we review independently. Jones, 257
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372747 - 2021-06-02
a double jeopardy violation has occurred is a question of law that we review independently. Jones, 257
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372747 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the maximum sentence allowed by law upon conviction. Moreover, his aggregate penalty did not include any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330248 - 2021-02-02
the maximum sentence allowed by law upon conviction. Moreover, his aggregate penalty did not include any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330248 - 2021-02-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. O’Connell O’Connell Law Office 403 S. Jefferson St. Green Bay, WI 54301 Joel Urmanski District
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209155 - 2018-03-07
. O’Connell O’Connell Law Office 403 S. Jefferson St. Green Bay, WI 54301 Joel Urmanski District
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209155 - 2018-03-07
Robert Meixelsperger v. Debbra L. Meixelsperger
was not rebuttable. While we agree that such a view of the law would be erroneous and would warrant reversal (see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12816 - 2005-03-31
was not rebuttable. While we agree that such a view of the law would be erroneous and would warrant reversal (see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12816 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2011-12).4 We first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95354 - 2014-09-15
and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2011-12).4 We first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95354 - 2014-09-15