Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6721 - 6730 of 15530 for fee.
Search results 6721 - 6730 of 15530 for fee.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
for professional misconduct involving (1) his receipt of advance fee No. 2018AP2347-D 3 payments
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247293 - 2019-09-24
for professional misconduct involving (1) his receipt of advance fee No. 2018AP2347-D 3 payments
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247293 - 2019-09-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to seek waiver of the filing fee for his certiorari action. By letter dated August 17, 2022, the Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840356 - 2024-08-22
to seek waiver of the filing fee for his certiorari action. By letter dated August 17, 2022, the Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840356 - 2024-08-22
COURT OF APPEALS
judicial review by certiorari. ¶6 Schmidt sought to waive prepayment of the filing fee for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72183 - 2011-10-12
judicial review by certiorari. ¶6 Schmidt sought to waive prepayment of the filing fee for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72183 - 2011-10-12
Lawrence J. Plourde v. John Berends
costs and attorney fees to Lawrence Plourde.[2] Habhegger asserts the open meetings law does not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25437 - 2006-08-08
costs and attorney fees to Lawrence Plourde.[2] Habhegger asserts the open meetings law does not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25437 - 2006-08-08
[PDF]
Mark Hughes v. Stephen Puckett
facility who paid his full filing fee for this action,” and he cited State ex rel. Speener v. Gudmanson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5313 - 2017-09-19
facility who paid his full filing fee for this action,” and he cited State ex rel. Speener v. Gudmanson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5313 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
$33,297.78 attorney’s fees. He argues: (1) the trial court erroneously concluded that issue preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29416 - 2007-06-18
$33,297.78 attorney’s fees. He argues: (1) the trial court erroneously concluded that issue preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29416 - 2007-06-18
[PDF]
Lawrence J. Plourde v. John Berends
judgment motion; and an order awarding costs and attorney fees to Lawrence Plourde.2 Habhegger asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25437 - 2017-09-21
judgment motion; and an order awarding costs and attorney fees to Lawrence Plourde.2 Habhegger asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25437 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr and TIG Insurance Company
, Charles H. Barr, and assessing additional attorney’s fees to Barr and his insurance company
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7383 - 2017-09-20
, Charles H. Barr, and assessing additional attorney’s fees to Barr and his insurance company
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7383 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Waushara Co. Department of Health and Family Services v. Michael M.
consisting of replacing Judge Murach. Michael M. also moves to waive the fees and transcript costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15711 - 2017-09-21
consisting of replacing Judge Murach. Michael M. also moves to waive the fees and transcript costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15711 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Waushara Co. Department of Health and Family Services v. Michael M.
consisting of replacing Judge Murach. Michael M. also moves to waive the fees and transcript costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15712 - 2017-09-21
consisting of replacing Judge Murach. Michael M. also moves to waive the fees and transcript costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15712 - 2017-09-21