Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6721 - 6730 of 9567 for jurors.
Search results 6721 - 6730 of 9567 for jurors.
[PDF]
State v. James W. Knipfer
Knipfer next alleges that the presiding judge, and at least three jurors, slept or failed to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25261 - 2017-09-21
Knipfer next alleges that the presiding judge, and at least three jurors, slept or failed to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25261 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Marion Steinberg v. Thomas R. Jensen
, as here, a trial court determines that “[t]his is a situation where reasonable jurors can conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14786 - 2017-09-21
, as here, a trial court determines that “[t]his is a situation where reasonable jurors can conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14786 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Harris’s argument “boils down to the unpersuasive assertion that if the jurors had seen the [beginning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442841 - 2021-10-19
that Harris’s argument “boils down to the unpersuasive assertion that if the jurors had seen the [beginning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442841 - 2021-10-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with a juror, the colloquy conducted on Zuniga’s decision to not testify, jury instructions, and polling
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175378 - 2017-09-21
with a juror, the colloquy conducted on Zuniga’s decision to not testify, jury instructions, and polling
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175378 - 2017-09-21
Marion Steinberg v. Thomas R. Jensen
is a situation where reasonable jurors can conclude that there was negligent [sic], and yet conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14786 - 2005-03-31
is a situation where reasonable jurors can conclude that there was negligent [sic], and yet conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14786 - 2005-03-31
State v. Juergen Huebner
fewer jurors, because that increases the numerical chance for a hung jury, that advantage does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14429 - 2005-03-31
fewer jurors, because that increases the numerical chance for a hung jury, that advantage does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14429 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Deanna Graetz v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
of the jurors and therefore an expert was not necessary. No(s). 00-3007 5 probative value as Graetz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3229 - 2017-09-19
of the jurors and therefore an expert was not necessary. No(s). 00-3007 5 probative value as Graetz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3229 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gary M. Kluwe
not identify any question that should have been asked of prospective jurors. Kluwe faults trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12083 - 2017-09-21
not identify any question that should have been asked of prospective jurors. Kluwe faults trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12083 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John Grover
, he contends that “an untainted juror could have harbored suspicion that [Dinzy’s] injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18178 - 2017-09-21
, he contends that “an untainted juror could have harbored suspicion that [Dinzy’s] injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18178 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael R. Alger
,” this would not have confused the jury. Any reasonable juror would have understood the import
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15359 - 2005-03-31
,” this would not have confused the jury. Any reasonable juror would have understood the import
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15359 - 2005-03-31