Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6721 - 6730 of 12913 for prosecuting.
Search results 6721 - 6730 of 12913 for prosecuting.
State v. Darin W. Baratka
recently determined that summary judgment does not apply in a traffic forfeiture prosecution under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5063 - 2005-03-31
recently determined that summary judgment does not apply in a traffic forfeiture prosecution under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5063 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the waiver of juvenile court jurisdiction. The court must first determine that prosecutive merit exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102299 - 2013-10-01
the waiver of juvenile court jurisdiction. The court must first determine that prosecutive merit exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102299 - 2013-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 18, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
that it does. We affirm. ¶2 We summarized the statutory procedure required to successfully prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26795 - 2006-10-17
that it does. We affirm. ¶2 We summarized the statutory procedure required to successfully prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26795 - 2006-10-17
City of Appleton v. Paul D. Wink
to be an officer told Wink to wait in the vehicle, not to start its engine. Wink is therefore not being prosecuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15760 - 2005-03-31
to be an officer told Wink to wait in the vehicle, not to start its engine. Wink is therefore not being prosecuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15760 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
provides: “Upon prosecution for a crime, the actor may be convicted of either the crime charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192159 - 2017-09-21
provides: “Upon prosecution for a crime, the actor may be convicted of either the crime charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192159 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brian J. Leiteritz
sentencing for any fair and just reason unless the prosecution would be substantially prejudiced. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6055 - 2017-09-19
sentencing for any fair and just reason unless the prosecution would be substantially prejudiced. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6055 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James F. Weber
and that there is no precedent for criminal prosecution of this type of an incident. This court is not persuaded. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15646 - 2017-09-21
and that there is no precedent for criminal prosecution of this type of an incident. This court is not persuaded. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15646 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for his or her change of heart beyond the simple desire to have a trial, as long as the prosecution has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257973 - 2020-04-14
for his or her change of heart beyond the simple desire to have a trial, as long as the prosecution has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257973 - 2020-04-14
State v. Donavin Hemphill
was offered unsolicited by the victim or witness, and was not generated by the desire of the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19482 - 2005-12-11
was offered unsolicited by the victim or witness, and was not generated by the desire of the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19482 - 2005-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
, the prosecution filed a motion in limine seeking to bar or limit the introduction of any prior bad act or McMorris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93425 - 2013-02-27
, the prosecution filed a motion in limine seeking to bar or limit the introduction of any prior bad act or McMorris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93425 - 2013-02-27