Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 67211 - 67220 of 68579 for law.

[PDF] NOTICE
of law that we review independently.” State v. Gralinski, 2007 WI App 233, ¶13, 306 Wis. 2d 101, 743
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46365 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Rock County Department of Human Services v. Yolanda M.
the benefit of the doubt. We start with the presumption that a judge knows and correctly applies the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5953 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Kenyota A.
O., 2000 WI App 70 at ¶6. We review questions of law independently. Id. DISCUSSION I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3874 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
compensation division administrative law judge (ALJ). On February 23, 2006, the ALJ issued a decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27

COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54852 - 2010-09-27

CA Blank Order
. The sentence totaling fifteen years’ imprisonment is well within the range authorized by law, see State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103136 - 2013-10-17

COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s findings of fact satisfy the constitutional standard is a question of law that this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94010 - 2013-03-12

[PDF] State v. Sheila E. Novin
. No. 97-1737-CR 4 Section 49.49(1)(b), STATS. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12627 - 2017-09-21

Mark B. Watts v. The Medical Protective Company
with regard to jury instructions and must give instructions whose overall meaning correctly states the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14992 - 2005-03-31

Susan Monfils v. Marlyn Charles
is a question of law which is reviewed without deference to the trial court’s determination. Benjamin v. Dohm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12387 - 2005-03-31