Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 67221 - 67230 of 84057 for simple case search.
Search results 67221 - 67230 of 84057 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). B.T. waived her right to a jury trial, and the case was tried to the court. The trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468293 - 2021-12-28
). B.T. waived her right to a jury trial, and the case was tried to the court. The trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468293 - 2021-12-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150402 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150402 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 54
2007 WI 54 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2004AP156-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29095 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI 54 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2004AP156-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29095 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
court in this case held that Michelle E.’s lawyer was not ineffective because, as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27179 - 2006-11-20
court in this case held that Michelle E.’s lawyer was not ineffective because, as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27179 - 2006-11-20
CA Blank Order
)(a), 51.20(13)(e). The applicable standard for dangerousness in this case is whether Anthony R. “[e]vidences
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101725 - 2013-09-04
)(a), 51.20(13)(e). The applicable standard for dangerousness in this case is whether Anthony R. “[e]vidences
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101725 - 2013-09-04
State v. Richard B. Young
discretion to fashion appropriate conditions of probation in each individual case. See State v. Simonetto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4664 - 2005-03-31
discretion to fashion appropriate conditions of probation in each individual case. See State v. Simonetto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4664 - 2005-03-31
Thomas Willan v. Sheriff Steven Rowe
, and dismissed the case. Willan appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 Wisconsin Stat. § 783.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2742 - 2005-03-31
, and dismissed the case. Willan appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 Wisconsin Stat. § 783.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2742 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for sentence modification on the grounds of a new factor in three jointly handled cases. After reviewing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133841 - 2017-09-21
for sentence modification on the grounds of a new factor in three jointly handled cases. After reviewing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133841 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gary Klatt
disagree. Klatt acknowledges that in a felony case, rehabilitation is not a new factor. See Jones v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11353 - 2017-09-19
disagree. Klatt acknowledges that in a felony case, rehabilitation is not a new factor. See Jones v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11353 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James R. Wolfe
Wolfe appeared after the status conference and the parties agreed to an adjournment. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19696 - 2017-09-21
Wolfe appeared after the status conference and the parties agreed to an adjournment. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19696 - 2017-09-21