Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 67251 - 67260 of 75316 for judgment for us.

Lacrosse County Department of Social Services v. Rose K.
, 123 (1991). We must modify, however, the substantial relationship test for use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8451 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Wood County Department of Human Services v. Denise F. R.
) by four days. ¶7 Denise first asks us to accept April O. as dispositive of her appeal. In April O
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4815 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Wood County Department of Human Services v. Denise F. R.
) by four days. ¶7 Denise first asks us to accept April O. as dispositive of her appeal. In April O
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4816 - 2017-09-19

State v. Aaron J. Grender
similar to those used to analyze a Terry stop. Id. The stop must, of course, be justified at its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7524 - 2005-03-31

Lacrosse County Department of Social Services v. Rose K.
, 123 (1991). We must modify, however, the substantial relationship test for use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8449 - 2005-03-31

State v. Daniel J. Beck
. Id. at 320-21. If we were to use the Black's Law Dictionary definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10566 - 2005-03-31

Maurice Fort Greer v. Lawrence Stahowiak
. DISCUSSION ¶6 Mandamus is an extraordinary writ that may be used to compel a public officer to perform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19737 - 2005-10-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
exercises its discretion when it examines the relevant facts, applies a proper standard of law, and, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89596 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Wood County Department of Human Services v. Joseph A. R.
by § 48.422(2) by four days. ¶7 Joseph first asks us to accept April O. as dispositive of his appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4798 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
homicide and two counts of first-degree reckless endangerment, all by use of a dangerous weapon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234713 - 2019-02-20