Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 67321 - 67330 of 68579 for law.

Winnebago County Health and Human Services v. Bridget D.
to proceed, the supreme court observed that prior case law had never held that the failure to advise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6309 - 2005-03-31

State v. James A. H.
, applied a proper standard of law, and reached a reasonable conclusion. Garfoot v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4070 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 10, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
). The issues of deficient performance and prejudice constitute mixed questions of law and fact. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114116 - 2014-06-09

State v. Patrick A. Peterson
consideration and mandatory release dates, all of those types of calculations under the current law have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3676 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion a reasonable judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41956 - 2014-09-15

State v. Craig R. Nelson
, and … it was a startling event or condition.” ¶20 Wisconsin case law demonstrates that the period of time between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21048 - 2006-01-24

COURT OF APPEALS
evidence within the meaning of the law. State v. Bauer, 2000 WI App 206, ¶7 n.2, 238 Wis. 2d 687, 617 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110501 - 2014-04-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for Thompson’s argument is not explained, he may be incorrectly relying on case law or statutes from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147176 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Town of Barton v. Division of Hearings and Appeals
and its application of a statute to undisputed facts are questions of law, and we are not bound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3929 - 2017-09-20

State v. Jacqee R. Anderson
N.W.2d 50 (1996). This is a question of law and is subject to our de novo review. See id. at 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15871 - 2005-03-31