Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 67351 - 67360 of 82644 for simple case.
Search results 67351 - 67360 of 82644 for simple case.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the procedural history of the case and addresses the validity of the pleas and sentences. Rocha has filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069321 - 2026-01-27
the procedural history of the case and addresses the validity of the pleas and sentences. Rocha has filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069321 - 2026-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the public because of various factors and that “a prison sentence is required in this case.” The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260757 - 2020-05-19
the public because of various factors and that “a prison sentence is required in this case.” The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260757 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
request, including his informant’s controlled purchase of narcotics. Thus, this is not a case in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48173 - 2014-09-15
request, including his informant’s controlled purchase of narcotics. Thus, this is not a case in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48173 - 2014-09-15
State v. Arthur L. Robinson
‑defense falls outside the ambit of the statute, is also contrary to case law. In Nelson, the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4547 - 2005-03-31
‑defense falls outside the ambit of the statute, is also contrary to case law. In Nelson, the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4547 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the court was not bound by the parties’ plea agreement, on the facts of this case, the court’s omission
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119139 - 2014-09-15
that the court was not bound by the parties’ plea agreement, on the facts of this case, the court’s omission
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119139 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Wisconsin Gas Company v. Allos, Inc.
Randall’s testimony. Conflicts in testimony are to be decided by the trier of fact, in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14233 - 2014-09-15
Randall’s testimony. Conflicts in testimony are to be decided by the trier of fact, in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14233 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
jurisdiction over his case due to irregularities in the way that his case was commenced; whether his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218915 - 2018-09-19
jurisdiction over his case due to irregularities in the way that his case was commenced; whether his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218915 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 94
2010 WI APP 94 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1422
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49554 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 94 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1422
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49554 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Additionally, given the strength of the State’s case, we conclude that any error in this regard would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207937 - 2018-01-30
. Additionally, given the strength of the State’s case, we conclude that any error in this regard would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207937 - 2018-01-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
the facts of the case. I recall the statement of the victim’s family at the time. The court took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48538 - 2014-09-15
the facts of the case. I recall the statement of the victim’s family at the time. The court took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48538 - 2014-09-15