Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6741 - 6750 of 57293 for id.
Search results 6741 - 6750 of 57293 for id.
Nagawicka Bay Sailing Club Owners Association, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
. App. 1996). Review of an agency’s decision is confined to the record. See id. The reviewing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11499 - 2005-03-31
. App. 1996). Review of an agency’s decision is confined to the record. See id. The reviewing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11499 - 2005-03-31
State v. Chad E. Lamberies
whether a defendant is competent to represent oneself. Id. at 212. ¶6 Lamberies first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20539 - 2005-12-05
whether a defendant is competent to represent oneself. Id. at 212. ¶6 Lamberies first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20539 - 2005-12-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or omissions “fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.” Id. at 688. To prove prejudice, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
or omissions “fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.” Id. at 688. To prove prejudice, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
they are clearly erroneous. Id., ¶20. We independently review whether reasonable grounds exist to grant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259160 - 2020-04-30
they are clearly erroneous. Id., ¶20. We independently review whether reasonable grounds exist to grant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259160 - 2020-04-30
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Salmons
discretionary determination. Id. Section 972.11, STATS., proscribes the admission of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13400 - 2017-09-21
discretionary determination. Id. Section 972.11, STATS., proscribes the admission of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13400 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the officers asked Mimms to exit the vehicle and produce his driver’s license. Id. The Court was tasked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108799 - 2017-09-21
of the officers asked Mimms to exit the vehicle and produce his driver’s license. Id. The Court was tasked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108799 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Salmons
discretionary determination. Id. Section 972.11, STATS., proscribes the admission of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12897 - 2017-09-21
discretionary determination. Id. Section 972.11, STATS., proscribes the admission of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12897 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a defendant’s sentence upon a showing of a new factor. Id., ¶35. The analysis is two-pronged. See id., ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121337 - 2014-09-15
a defendant’s sentence upon a showing of a new factor. Id., ¶35. The analysis is two-pronged. See id., ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121337 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was exercised “on the basis of clearly irrelevant or improper factors.” Id. When the exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831484 - 2024-07-30
was exercised “on the basis of clearly irrelevant or improper factors.” Id. When the exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831484 - 2024-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or omissions “fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.” Id. at 688. To prove prejudice, “[t]he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
or omissions “fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.” Id. at 688. To prove prejudice, “[t]he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03