Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6741 - 6750 of 16235 for search.

Individual Subpoenaed to Appear at Waukesha County John Doe Case No. 2003 JD 001 v. J. Mac Davis
judge’s ability to issue a search warrant even though such is not an enumerated power under § 968.26
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1241 - 2004-10-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
admonition to the jury, “you are not to search for doubt, you are to search for the truth,” reduced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237984 - 2019-03-26

[PDF] Individual Subpoenaed to Appear at Waukesha County John Doe Case No. 2003 JD 001 v. J. Mac Davis
406 (1996), the court discussed the John Doe judge’s ability to issue a search warrant even though
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1241 - 2017-09-19

State v. Damian Darnell Washington
him down, and the other searched him. Washington also testified that he had been in contact with one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18174 - 2005-07-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
rape.” ¶27 Christopher concedes, however, that he searched for pornography depicting “teen rape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990081 - 2025-07-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
), evidence obtained through a search warrant. The circuit court did not err; we affirm. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118314 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. John Foster Fant
of an illegal search. The trial court denied the motion. Fant was tried and convicted by a jury in January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13116 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), evidence obtained through a search warrant. The circuit court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118314 - 2014-07-29

State v. Roosevelt Williams
and the woman to get out of the Blazer. [4] The officers searched them and ordered them into the locked back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11024 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph R. Przybilla
argues that the chief did not, and that the fruits of the chief's search should have been suppressed. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9172 - 2005-03-31