Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6741 - 6750 of 21471 for warrants.
Search results 6741 - 6750 of 21471 for warrants.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, to warrant a hearing on an alleged Bangert violation, a defendant’s motion must allege “that in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73689 - 2014-09-15
, to warrant a hearing on an alleged Bangert violation, a defendant’s motion must allege “that in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73689 - 2014-09-15
State v. Sidney Earl Rushing
-habitual criminality. From November 23, 1993, until the issuance of a bench warrant for him on May 10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8847 - 2005-03-31
-habitual criminality. From November 23, 1993, until the issuance of a bench warrant for him on May 10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8847 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nigel R. Burgess
), and as conclusory, and thus insufficient to warrant an evidentiary hearing. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21188 - 2006-02-06
), and as conclusory, and thus insufficient to warrant an evidentiary hearing. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21188 - 2006-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
sniff, we affirm the judgment. ¶2 In June 2012, officers arrested White on an outstanding warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129275 - 2014-11-17
sniff, we affirm the judgment. ¶2 In June 2012, officers arrested White on an outstanding warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129275 - 2014-11-17
State v. Kory J. Malcheski
the Fourth Amendment because it comes within the exception to the warrant requirement for exigent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4826 - 2005-03-31
the Fourth Amendment because it comes within the exception to the warrant requirement for exigent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4826 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the existence of a new factor warranting sentencing modification. After reviewing the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484462 - 2022-02-16
the existence of a new factor warranting sentencing modification. After reviewing the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484462 - 2022-02-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a fundamental defect fatal to an action, regardless of prejudice, and warrants dismissal. Hagen v. City
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240772 - 2019-05-22
is a fundamental defect fatal to an action, regardless of prejudice, and warrants dismissal. Hagen v. City
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240772 - 2019-05-22
State v. Devaldis A. Garth
and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3028 - 2005-03-31
and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3028 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth Garrigan
and warrant on November 6, 1997. The trial court sentenced Garrigan on January 26, 1998, to two years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14183 - 2005-03-31
and warrant on November 6, 1997. The trial court sentenced Garrigan on January 26, 1998, to two years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14183 - 2005-03-31
Mark J. Santner v. Debbie Mitchell
on probation on case #98CF308. However, probation was subsequently revoked and a revocation order and warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7195 - 2005-03-31
on probation on case #98CF308. However, probation was subsequently revoked and a revocation order and warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7195 - 2005-03-31