Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 67471 - 67480 of 68579 for law.
Search results 67471 - 67480 of 68579 for law.
[PDF]
Joseph M. Graziano, Jr. v. Ronald L. Allen, M.D.
by the instructions’ did not correctly state the law.” Johnson v. Agoncillo, 183 Wis. 2d 143, 148, 515 N.W.2d 508
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5680 - 2017-09-19
by the instructions’ did not correctly state the law.” Johnson v. Agoncillo, 183 Wis. 2d 143, 148, 515 N.W.2d 508
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5680 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 22
of WIS. STAT. § 77.52(2)(a)1. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161398 - 2017-09-21
of WIS. STAT. § 77.52(2)(a)1. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161398 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a mixed question of fact and law. Id., ¶10. This court upholds the circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904184 - 2025-01-22
presents a mixed question of fact and law. Id., ¶10. This court upholds the circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904184 - 2025-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to law enforcement and at the preliminary hearing, and found no major inconsistencies. Counsel also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246825 - 2019-09-19
to law enforcement and at the preliminary hearing, and found no major inconsistencies. Counsel also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246825 - 2019-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
defers to the circuit court’s factual findings but independently determines, as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701648 - 2023-09-12
defers to the circuit court’s factual findings but independently determines, as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701648 - 2023-09-12
[PDF]
State v. Obea S. Hayes
by the law articulated in Gomez. We cannot sub silentio get around this rule by simply holding a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5333 - 2017-09-19
by the law articulated in Gomez. We cannot sub silentio get around this rule by simply holding a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5333 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Whether counsel’s actions were deficient or prejudicial is a mixed question of law and fact. Id. at 698
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303324 - 2020-11-11
Whether counsel’s actions were deficient or prejudicial is a mixed question of law and fact. Id. at 698
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303324 - 2020-11-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and applying a statute to a set of facts are both questions of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485107 - 2022-02-22
and applying a statute to a set of facts are both questions of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485107 - 2022-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Wesley Vann
alleges sufficient facts is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. We determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14223 - 2014-09-15
alleges sufficient facts is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. We determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14223 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Daniel T. Shea
presents a question of statutory interpretation. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12880 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of statutory interpretation. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12880 - 2017-09-21