Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6751 - 6760 of 35931 for affidavit of mailing.
Search results 6751 - 6760 of 35931 for affidavit of mailing.
[PDF]
NOTICE
affidavit that had not been provided to the defense. The affidavit stated that one of the alleged victims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28471 - 2014-09-15
affidavit that had not been provided to the defense. The affidavit stated that one of the alleged victims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28471 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Francis E. Altman
it was not accompanied by a sworn “affidavit.” Altman is mistaken. Officer Dale Wisnewski presented a “Complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26043 - 2017-09-21
it was not accompanied by a sworn “affidavit.” Altman is mistaken. Officer Dale Wisnewski presented a “Complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26043 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gregory D. Jens
) Nikki K. has allegedly provided an affidavit indicating that Jens was not the perpetrator; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7073 - 2005-03-31
) Nikki K. has allegedly provided an affidavit indicating that Jens was not the perpetrator; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7073 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, seeking a new trial based on the discovery of new evidence. Attached to the motion was the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41717 - 2009-10-05
, seeking a new trial based on the discovery of new evidence. Attached to the motion was the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41717 - 2009-10-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the scheduling order. In a supporting affidavit, Attorney Stingl conceded his client had not complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256673 - 2020-03-17
the scheduling order. In a supporting affidavit, Attorney Stingl conceded his client had not complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256673 - 2020-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
-family house in the city of Milwaukee (hereafter, “the house”). He filed a seven-page affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98665 - 2013-07-01
-family house in the city of Milwaukee (hereafter, “the house”). He filed a seven-page affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98665 - 2013-07-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erred by failing to obtain impeachment evidence against J.H. Bauer points to a supporting affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803801 - 2024-05-23
erred by failing to obtain impeachment evidence against J.H. Bauer points to a supporting affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803801 - 2024-05-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the District relies on. ¶22 The extrinsic evidence the District points to is the affidavit of District
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150741 - 2017-09-21
the District relies on. ¶22 The extrinsic evidence the District points to is the affidavit of District
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150741 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Attached to the motion was the affidavit of Joseph Jordan,3 who stated that he was with Philip Jordan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41717 - 2014-09-15
. Attached to the motion was the affidavit of Joseph Jordan,3 who stated that he was with Philip Jordan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41717 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was privileged under WIS. STAT. § 905.04. With this second motion, Stryker filed an affidavit from a social
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526870 - 2022-06-01
was privileged under WIS. STAT. § 905.04. With this second motion, Stryker filed an affidavit from a social
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526870 - 2022-06-01