Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6751 - 6760 of 20925 for word.

2008 WI APP 165
is to the language of the statute itself. Id., ¶8. If the words of the statute convey the legislative intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34369 - 2008-11-11

[PDF] Lisa B. v. William J.T., Sr.
the word “has” No. 04-3176 9 in the statute to mean it should take into account present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7675 - 2017-09-19

Tyler Dorbritz v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
” and “your” as “the named insured in the declarations. These words also refer to your spouse if a resident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18136 - 2005-07-26

State v. Robert Junior Carr
“does not fault the sentencing court for failing to use the magic words ‘minimum-custody standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18142 - 2005-05-16

[PDF] State v. George Taylor
Taylor’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. In a succinctly worded order, it ruled: Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13870 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Tara Kestel-Rauls v. Dale T. Moore
words or terms are to be construed by extrinsic evidence, the question is one for the trier of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13377 - 2017-09-21

James Mews v. Wisconsin Department of Commerce
, ¶6, 258 Wis. 2d 351, 655 N.W.2d 175. ¶19 Generally, the word “shall” in a statute is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6033 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Robert A. Novotny v. National Western Life Insurance Company
that a word has more than one dictionary meaning, or that the parties disagree about the meaning, does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10647 - 2017-09-20

WI App 116 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1707 Complete Title o...
not require a building—trumped the declaration.[4] In other words, for taxation purposes under § 703.21(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102043 - 2013-10-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
rational process.” State v. Mayo, 2007 WI 78, ¶31, 301 Wis. 2d 642, 734 N.W.2d 115. In other words, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293785 - 2020-10-06