Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6761 - 6770 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 6761 - 6770 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
/bond forfeiture” and from an order denying his motion to reconsider the forfeiture judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007249 - 2025-09-09
/bond forfeiture” and from an order denying his motion to reconsider the forfeiture judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007249 - 2025-09-09
Frontsheet
The referee issued his report on February 13, 2014. Attorney Din filed a motion for reconsideration
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133438 - 2015-01-21
The referee issued his report on February 13, 2014. Attorney Din filed a motion for reconsideration
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133438 - 2015-01-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
report on February 13, 2014. Attorney Din filed a motion for reconsideration or, in the alternative
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133438 - 2017-09-21
report on February 13, 2014. Attorney Din filed a motion for reconsideration or, in the alternative
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133438 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gilbert J. Grobstick
a judgment convicting him of obstructing an officer, § 946.41(1), STATS., and felony escape from custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7844 - 2017-09-19
a judgment convicting him of obstructing an officer, § 946.41(1), STATS., and felony escape from custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7844 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Following our remand for a consideration of Mr. E.’s post-order motion, the circuit court heard testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57493 - 2010-12-06
. Following our remand for a consideration of Mr. E.’s post-order motion, the circuit court heard testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57493 - 2010-12-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a consideration of Mr. E.’s post-order motion, the circuit court heard testimony on his ineffective-assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57493 - 2014-09-15
for a consideration of Mr. E.’s post-order motion, the circuit court heard testimony on his ineffective-assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57493 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
should have suppressed in-custody statements Janusiak made to police because the statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160383 - 2017-09-21
should have suppressed in-custody statements Janusiak made to police because the statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160383 - 2017-09-21
Certification
for interference with custody of children. There, we stated that withholding custody of a child “addresses
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73854 - 2011-11-15
for interference with custody of children. There, we stated that withholding custody of a child “addresses
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73854 - 2011-11-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in this case “from the time he was in custody on an extended supervision hold” on April 24, 2020,2 until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813552 - 2024-06-18
in this case “from the time he was in custody on an extended supervision hold” on April 24, 2020,2 until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813552 - 2024-06-18
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2010AP2514-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2008CF120
for interference with custody of children. There, we stated that withholding custody of a child “addresses
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73854 - 2014-09-15
for interference with custody of children. There, we stated that withholding custody of a child “addresses
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73854 - 2014-09-15