Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6761 - 6770 of 61554 for judgment.
Search results 6761 - 6770 of 61554 for judgment.
2010 WI APP 139
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Calumet County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54202 - 2011-08-21
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Calumet County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54202 - 2011-08-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
have appealed from an order granting the Town of Burlington’s motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74678 - 2014-09-15
have appealed from an order granting the Town of Burlington’s motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74678 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-APPELLANT. No. 2014AP736 2 APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Walworth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141255 - 2017-09-21
-APPELLANT. No. 2014AP736 2 APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Walworth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141255 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Constance Wolfgram v. Lewis E. Olson
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: WILLIAM D. GARDNER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11247 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: WILLIAM D. GARDNER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11247 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
lacked the requisite ripeness and dismissing its declaratory judgment action. We affirm because EE has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35714 - 2014-09-15
lacked the requisite ripeness and dismissing its declaratory judgment action. We affirm because EE has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35714 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, Inc., Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34881 - 2008-12-15
, Inc., Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34881 - 2008-12-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant. APPEAL from judgments of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: paul r. van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141776 - 2015-05-18
, Defendant. APPEAL from judgments of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: paul r. van
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141776 - 2015-05-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-APPELLANT. APPEALS from judgments and orders of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: BRIAN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223918 - 2018-10-23
-APPELLANT. APPEALS from judgments and orders of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: BRIAN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223918 - 2018-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on reconsideration, the court amended a judgment in Omelina’s favor to award him $523,397.17, rather than
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821311 - 2024-07-02
on reconsideration, the court amended a judgment in Omelina’s favor to award him $523,397.17, rather than
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821311 - 2024-07-02
[PDF]
Randall and Roberta Spence v. Thomas and Diane Kolodzienski
-APPELLANTS. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Pierce County: DANE MOREY, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5190 - 2017-09-19
-APPELLANTS. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Pierce County: DANE MOREY, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5190 - 2017-09-19