Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6761 - 6770 of 19288 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 6761 - 6770 of 19288 for transfer by affidavit.
[PDF]
Lemont Gregory v. United Parcel Service
affidavit were filed on July 30, 1997. There is nothing in the record to establish that UPS was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14670 - 2017-09-21
affidavit were filed on July 30, 1997. There is nothing in the record to establish that UPS was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14670 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in which the inmate is confined. Sec. 302.113(9g)(c). The petition must be accompanied by affidavits
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346589 - 2021-03-16
in which the inmate is confined. Sec. 302.113(9g)(c). The petition must be accompanied by affidavits
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346589 - 2021-03-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
five months later, on August 15, 2018, and states: “affidavit of service.” Six months after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=895058 - 2024-12-23
five months later, on August 15, 2018, and states: “affidavit of service.” Six months after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=895058 - 2024-12-23
[PDF]
Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
and affidavits in support of their summary judgment motions. The St. Luke's defendants adopted the brief filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9557 - 2017-09-19
and affidavits in support of their summary judgment motions. The St. Luke's defendants adopted the brief filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9557 - 2017-09-19
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mary Kathleen Arthur
to the motion for summary judgment Attorney Mary Kathleen Arthur submitted an affidavit executed by her husband
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16822 - 2005-03-31
to the motion for summary judgment Attorney Mary Kathleen Arthur submitted an affidavit executed by her husband
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16822 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Thomas V. Rankin, M.D. v. Medical Examining Board
that the signature he affixed is attached to his affidavit.” The affidavit provided: I, the above-named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4850 - 2017-09-19
that the signature he affixed is attached to his affidavit.” The affidavit provided: I, the above-named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4850 - 2017-09-19
Partners In Design Architects, Inc. v. Phoenix Internet Technologies, Inc.
Partners’ complaint as alleging a breach of contract claim and awarded damages based on counsel’s affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3651 - 2005-03-31
Partners’ complaint as alleging a breach of contract claim and awarded damages based on counsel’s affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3651 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Errata
, arguing that neither defendant was the landlord for the property at issue. Counsel’s affidavit stated
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207932 - 2018-01-30
, arguing that neither defendant was the landlord for the property at issue. Counsel’s affidavit stated
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207932 - 2018-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP1387 3 In his supporting affidavit,3 Brian Bautz averred that his counsel forced him to sign
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460100 - 2021-12-09
. No. 2020AP1387 3 In his supporting affidavit,3 Brian Bautz averred that his counsel forced him to sign
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460100 - 2021-12-09
AM Transportation, Inc. v. Matarah Industries, Inc.
, “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2436 - 2005-03-31
, “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2436 - 2005-03-31