Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 67611 - 67620 of 83432 for case codes/1000.
Search results 67611 - 67620 of 83432 for case codes/1000.
State v. Jerry Harden
in the identification bureau. He identified, as a trial exhibit, the fingerprint card he completed in this case. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5604 - 2005-03-31
in the identification bureau. He identified, as a trial exhibit, the fingerprint card he completed in this case. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5604 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bernard E. Burgess
to, but he denied an underlying allegation in that case, leading the trial court to believe Burgess denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3279 - 2017-09-19
to, but he denied an underlying allegation in that case, leading the trial court to believe Burgess denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3279 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Alfonso Taylor
feel would affect your ability to be fair and impartial in deciding this case?” The No. 02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5437 - 2017-09-19
feel would affect your ability to be fair and impartial in deciding this case?” The No. 02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5437 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the officers had probable cause to do so. ¶9 Following the denial of Ivanez’s motion to suppress, the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136377 - 2017-09-21
, the officers had probable cause to do so. ¶9 Following the denial of Ivanez’s motion to suppress, the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136377 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Whitecaps Homes, Inc. v. Kenosha County Board of Review
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1913 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11063 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1913 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11063 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in favor of the reasonableness of Randall’s actions. ¶22 As to the third factor, this case involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118993 - 2014-09-15
in favor of the reasonableness of Randall’s actions. ¶22 As to the third factor, this case involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118993 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
into court”). Moreover, the unclean hands doctrine is inapplicable because this is not a case in equity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104473 - 2017-09-21
into court”). Moreover, the unclean hands doctrine is inapplicable because this is not a case in equity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104473 - 2017-09-21
Hugh R. Mommsen v. Duane Schueller
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3095
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14709 - 2014-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3095
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14709 - 2014-06-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
receive federal immunity, as the case was solely in the city’s jurisdiction, or be placed in witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175582 - 2017-09-21
receive federal immunity, as the case was solely in the city’s jurisdiction, or be placed in witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175582 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
, is applied where it is clear from the lack of agency precedent that the case is one of first impression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
, is applied where it is clear from the lack of agency precedent that the case is one of first impression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21