Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6771 - 6780 of 24556 for extending.
Search results 6771 - 6780 of 24556 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consisting of ten years’ initial confinement and fifteen years’ extended supervision. The court then found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=403075 - 2021-08-03
consisting of ten years’ initial confinement and fifteen years’ extended supervision. The court then found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=403075 - 2021-08-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. It also ordered thirty-six
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165439 - 2017-09-21
years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. It also ordered thirty-six
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165439 - 2017-09-21
Precision Erecting, Inc. v. AFW Foundry, Inc.
that Circle Electric’s answer was late and that no motion to extend the time for filing an answer had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11362 - 2005-03-31
that Circle Electric’s answer was late and that no motion to extend the time for filing an answer had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11362 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for holding the hearing can be “extended once for 14 days” if the court makes certain findings with respect
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987464 - 2025-07-24
for holding the hearing can be “extended once for 14 days” if the court makes certain findings with respect
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987464 - 2025-07-24
Brown County v. Jeffrey T.M.
extending his commitment from August 23, 2001, for a period of one year.[2] Jeffrey specifically argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5596 - 2005-03-31
extending his commitment from August 23, 2001, for a period of one year.[2] Jeffrey specifically argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5596 - 2005-03-31
Robert Macemon v. Jessica Christie
. The question presented by the instant case is whether the bar of Escalona-Naranjo should be extended to appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12173 - 2005-03-31
. The question presented by the instant case is whether the bar of Escalona-Naranjo should be extended to appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12173 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision on each of the three counts, with the reckless homicide sentences being
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219529 - 2018-09-19
years of extended supervision on each of the three counts, with the reckless homicide sentences being
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219529 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the vehicle she was driving had been illegally extended. The State had the burden to prove voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432581 - 2021-09-30
of the vehicle she was driving had been illegally extended. The State had the burden to prove voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432581 - 2021-09-30
CA Blank Order
followed by eight years of extended supervision. Thereafter, Dormer, by counsel, filed a postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134009 - 2015-02-03
followed by eight years of extended supervision. Thereafter, Dormer, by counsel, filed a postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134009 - 2015-02-03
[PDF]
State v. Russell B. Mott
followed by ten years of extended supervision. After sentencing, Mott elected to proceed pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25286 - 2017-09-21
followed by ten years of extended supervision. After sentencing, Mott elected to proceed pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25286 - 2017-09-21