Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6771 - 6780 of 83387 for simple case search.
Search results 6771 - 6780 of 83387 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Joel L. Ritchie
to the analogous case law in a search warrant setting where the courts have adopted a deferential standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15766 - 2017-09-21
to the analogous case law in a search warrant setting where the courts have adopted a deferential standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15766 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joel L. Ritchie
points us to the analogous case law in a search warrant setting where the courts have adopted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15766 - 2005-03-31
points us to the analogous case law in a search warrant setting where the courts have adopted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15766 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in our decisional law. See State v. Ndina, 2009 WI 21, ¶28, 315 Wis. 2d 653, 761 N.W.2d 612 (“The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000714 - 2025-08-26
in our decisional law. See State v. Ndina, 2009 WI 21, ¶28, 315 Wis. 2d 653, 761 N.W.2d 612 (“The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000714 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - April 2021
cell phone. This case involves questions about privacy and search and seizure under the Fourth
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355114 - 2021-04-07
cell phone. This case involves questions about privacy and search and seizure under the Fourth
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355114 - 2021-04-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was held in this case.10 Hager resulted in a fractured decision that, given the various rationales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271462 - 2020-07-21
was held in this case.10 Hager resulted in a fractured decision that, given the various rationales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271462 - 2020-07-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
) probable cause to arrest him did not exist; (3) police lacked authority to search Angela Beckum’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32815 - 2014-09-15
) probable cause to arrest him did not exist; (3) police lacked authority to search Angela Beckum’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32815 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to arrest him did not exist; (3) police lacked authority to search Angela Beckum’s automobile; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32815 - 2008-05-27
to arrest him did not exist; (3) police lacked authority to search Angela Beckum’s automobile; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32815 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
State v. Everton Taylor
-3514-CR 2 arrest; and (2) testimony in support of the application for a warrant to search his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3438 - 2017-09-19
-3514-CR 2 arrest; and (2) testimony in support of the application for a warrant to search his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3438 - 2017-09-19
State v. Everton Taylor
in support of the application for a warrant to search his residence included statements that were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31
in support of the application for a warrant to search his residence included statements that were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter J. Pronold
motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant and several subpoenas. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14935 - 2005-03-31
motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant and several subpoenas. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14935 - 2005-03-31