Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 67761 - 67770 of 75042 for public records.
Search results 67761 - 67770 of 75042 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 20, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
) is constitutional. We have reviewed the record, however, and we conclude that they did waive the constitutionality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27457 - 2006-12-19
) is constitutional. We have reviewed the record, however, and we conclude that they did waive the constitutionality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27457 - 2006-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of record, applied a proper legal standard and, using a rational process, reached a reasonable conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88172 - 2012-10-15
of record, applied a proper legal standard and, using a rational process, reached a reasonable conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88172 - 2012-10-15
COURT OF APPEALS
read the complaint he meant “the police report.” The State indicated, unchallenged, that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100936 - 2013-08-20
read the complaint he meant “the police report.” The State indicated, unchallenged, that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100936 - 2013-08-20
CA Blank Order
trial counsel was ineffective. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131229 - 2014-12-09
trial counsel was ineffective. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131229 - 2014-12-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
was a determination that the new factor alone was insufficient to justify sentence reduction. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33548 - 2014-09-15
was a determination that the new factor alone was insufficient to justify sentence reduction. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33548 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95174 - 2013-04-04
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95174 - 2013-04-04
Richard N. Nickl v. John Husz
of these documents, but they were not included in the parties’ briefs or appendices. On this record, we need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13139 - 2005-03-31
of these documents, but they were not included in the parties’ briefs or appendices. On this record, we need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13139 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
”). Based on our review of the briefs and record, No. 2014AP810 2 we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126146 - 2017-09-21
”). Based on our review of the briefs and record, No. 2014AP810 2 we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126146 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118590 - 2014-09-15
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118590 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) (2013-14). 1 Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm. The parties were divorced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174552 - 2017-09-21
) (2013-14). 1 Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm. The parties were divorced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174552 - 2017-09-21