Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6781 - 6790 of 24443 for extending.
Search results 6781 - 6790 of 24443 for extending.
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision. We agree with appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105581 - 2013-12-17
of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision. We agree with appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105581 - 2013-12-17
John L. Burns v. Douglas M. Scheel
easement rights extends southeasterly from the town road over the Brandners' property, extending east
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11789 - 2005-03-31
easement rights extends southeasterly from the town road over the Brandners' property, extending east
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11789 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement, and to a term of between five and six years of extended supervision. The trial court sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30223 - 2007-09-10
confinement, and to a term of between five and six years of extended supervision. The trial court sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30223 - 2007-09-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of confinement and four years extended supervision on each reckless endangerment count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728260 - 2023-11-14
years of confinement and four years extended supervision on each reckless endangerment count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728260 - 2023-11-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. § 805.17(3) extends the time period to appeal that order to 90 days from the circuit court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014859 - 2025-09-30
. STAT. § 805.17(3) extends the time period to appeal that order to 90 days from the circuit court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014859 - 2025-09-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the court engaged in an extended dialog with both sides about whether the court should grant motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=588295 - 2022-11-10
, the court engaged in an extended dialog with both sides about whether the court should grant motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=588295 - 2022-11-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
of thirty years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision. Boyd filed a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28153 - 2014-09-15
of thirty years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision. Boyd filed a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28153 - 2014-09-15
Jessica A. Rusch v. Adam D. Steinke
did not extend the time to appeal. See Silverton Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cas. Ins. Co., 143 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20725 - 2005-12-21
did not extend the time to appeal. See Silverton Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cas. Ins. Co., 143 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20725 - 2005-12-21
State v. Mary K.
since, and the CHIPS orders for the children have been extended annually. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18074 - 2005-06-01
since, and the CHIPS orders for the children have been extended annually. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18074 - 2005-06-01
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. Just over two months later, Owens filed a presentence motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145061 - 2015-07-27
confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. Just over two months later, Owens filed a presentence motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145061 - 2015-07-27