Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6781 - 6790 of 74557 for public records.
Search results 6781 - 6790 of 74557 for public records.
[PDF]
WI 66
of law will not be detrimental to the administration of justice or subversive of the public interest
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33127 - 2014-09-15
of law will not be detrimental to the administration of justice or subversive of the public interest
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33127 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
will not be detrimental to the administration of justice or subversive of the public interest, and that the attorney has
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33127 - 2008-06-19
will not be detrimental to the administration of justice or subversive of the public interest, and that the attorney has
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33127 - 2008-06-19
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark G. Pierquet
review of the record, we agree that a public reprimand with the imposition of the conditions described
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20066 - 2017-09-21
review of the record, we agree that a public reprimand with the imposition of the conditions described
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20066 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court system. ¶4 In its decision, the circuit court first examined Max’s record. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=583033 - 2022-11-01
court system. ¶4 In its decision, the circuit court first examined Max’s record. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=583033 - 2022-11-01
State v. Trevor D. Jones
asked for a public defender, but did not qualify to receive a lawyer because his income was too high
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2945 - 2005-03-31
asked for a public defender, but did not qualify to receive a lawyer because his income was too high
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2945 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark G. Pierquet
regarding discipline. Based on our review of the record, we agree that a public reprimand
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20066 - 2005-10-24
regarding discipline. Based on our review of the record, we agree that a public reprimand
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20066 - 2005-10-24
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the amended judgment reflecting Fecht’s modified sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95386 - 2013-04-16
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the amended judgment reflecting Fecht’s modified sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95386 - 2013-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
on the record, which include, but are not limited to, protection of the community, punishment of the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45860 - 2010-01-19
on the record, which include, but are not limited to, protection of the community, punishment of the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45860 - 2010-01-19
State v. Robert J. Stynes
to the offense committed as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable people concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13186 - 2005-03-31
to the offense committed as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable people concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13186 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
Facility 210 West Center Street Juneau, WI 53039 Steven D. Grunder Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101201 - 2013-08-19
Facility 210 West Center Street Juneau, WI 53039 Steven D. Grunder Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101201 - 2013-08-19