Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6791 - 6800 of 49348 for writ of certiorari forms -(/1000).

State v. Darrin L. Britt
; such claims should be presented in a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10224 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
as barred by Escalona. Vega also petitioned this court for a writ of habeas corpus, which was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980324 - 2025-07-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for supervisory writ with the Wisconsin Supreme Court. On August 19, Laura, who resides in Montana, initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183110 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
petition the court of appeals for a writ of habeas corpus.”) (emphasis in Starks). B. Ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108849 - 2017-09-21

Rule Order
to the court's denials of petitions for review or petitions for supervisory writs. See, e.g., Koll v. DOJ
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146023 - 2015-08-06

[PDF] State v. Robert Vargas
13, 1994, we granted Vargas's petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8463 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
In 2000, Macon filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this court. Macon’s petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125288 - 2014-10-27

COURT OF APPEALS
for a writ of habeas corpus.”) (emphasis in Starks). B. Ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10

[PDF] State v. Darrin L. Britt
be presented in a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the appellate court). By the Court.—Order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10224 - 2017-09-20

Business Park Development Co., LLC v. Molecular Biology Resources, Inc.
of eviction resulting in a writ of restitution in favor of Business Park Development Co., LLC. The judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2195 - 2005-03-31