Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 681 - 690 of 6319 for 208.

State v. Michael Crawford
? [and] ¼ ‘Who says so?’” State v. Elson, 60 Wis.2d 54, 57, 208 N.W.2d 363, 365 (1973) (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11406 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald Mentzel
withdrawal motion.” More recently, in State v. Thompson, 208 Wis.2d 253, 257-58, 559 N.W.2d 917, 918 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12661 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
repeater status.” State v. Liebnitz, 231 Wis. 2d 272, 275, 603 N.W.2d 208 (1999). Lisner argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173630 - 2017-09-21

Dina Matlin v. City of Sheboygan
v. Rosen, 72 Wis. 2d 200, 208, 240 N.W.2d 168 (1976). Whether a court has jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2987 - 2005-03-31

Danny R. Peterson v. Midwest Security Insurance Company
and is subject to our de novo review. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16203 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
result would be reached” with the new evidence. See State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 473, 561 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32389 - 2008-04-07

[PDF] Acknowledgement of Filing of Brief (Lisa Hunter et al. - Amicus Brief)
Street Suite 2200 Madison WI 53718 Daniel R. Suhr Liberty Justice Center 208 S. LaSalle St. Suite 1690
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/acknowfilingbriefhunteramicus.pdf - 2021-10-18

[PDF] Acknowledgement of Filing of Brief (Congressmen - Amicus Brief)
Street Suite 2200 Madison WI 53718 Daniel R. Suhr Liberty Justice Center 208 S. LaSalle St. Suite 1690
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/acknowfilingbriefcongressmenamicus.pdf - 2021-10-18

COURT OF APPEALS
at sentencing. Id., 2008 WI App 80, ¶9, 312 Wis. 2d at 207–208, 752 N.W.2d at 395. ¶5 Cherry did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61890 - 2011-03-28

[PDF] Pamela L. Herter v. Tim L. Hansen
the power to overrule, modify or withdraw language from a prior published opinion. Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13599 - 2017-09-21