Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 681 - 690 of 83742 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 681 - 690 of 83742 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
simple battery as a lesser included offense of aggravated battery. We agree that the State’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33147 - 2008-06-23
simple battery as a lesser included offense of aggravated battery. We agree that the State’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33147 - 2008-06-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
statement to police was not prejudicial. He also argues the trial court erred by submitting simple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33147 - 2014-09-15
statement to police was not prejudicial. He also argues the trial court erred by submitting simple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33147 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that No. 2023AP955 2 this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033907 - 2025-11-11
at conference that No. 2023AP955 2 this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033907 - 2025-11-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that No. 2023AP955 2 this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033907 - 2025-11-11
at conference that No. 2023AP955 2 this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033907 - 2025-11-11
[PDF]
State v. Charles R. Wincek
for the project at $1000. Following the testimony and argument at the restitution hearing, Wincek asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11804 - 2017-09-21
for the project at $1000. Following the testimony and argument at the restitution hearing, Wincek asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11804 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles R. Wincek
on the job and that he valued the materials Wincek provided for the project at $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11804 - 2011-05-19
on the job and that he valued the materials Wincek provided for the project at $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11804 - 2011-05-19
[PDF]
State v. Samuel Joseph Cole
to his statement the case would not be able to be taken to trial,” and further that Cole believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19096 - 2017-09-21
to his statement the case would not be able to be taken to trial,” and further that Cole believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19096 - 2017-09-21
State v. Samuel Joseph Cole
guilty because his lawyer advised him “that due to his statement the case would not be able to be taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19096 - 2005-07-25
guilty because his lawyer advised him “that due to his statement the case would not be able to be taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19096 - 2005-07-25
[PDF]
State v. Evelio Duarte-Vestar
arguments and affirm the order. Duarte-Vestar was charged in this case (trial court no. 93-CM-1307
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15257 - 2017-09-21
arguments and affirm the order. Duarte-Vestar was charged in this case (trial court no. 93-CM-1307
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15257 - 2017-09-21
State v. Evelio Duarte-Vestar
and affirm the order. Duarte-Vestar was charged in this case (trial court no. 93-CM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15257 - 2005-03-31
and affirm the order. Duarte-Vestar was charged in this case (trial court no. 93-CM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15257 - 2005-03-31