Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6801 - 6810 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 6801 - 6810 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
should have suppressed in-custody statements Janusiak made to police because the statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160383 - 2017-09-21
should have suppressed in-custody statements Janusiak made to police because the statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160383 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
of the Portage County Circuit Court,[1] denying Carlos A. Cummings' ("Cummings") motion to suppress and motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117931 - 2015-01-19
of the Portage County Circuit Court,[1] denying Carlos A. Cummings' ("Cummings") motion to suppress and motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117931 - 2015-01-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of his motion, Cummings asserted that he was "in custody" prior to being given Miranda warnings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117931 - 2015-01-20
of his motion, Cummings asserted that he was "in custody" prior to being given Miranda warnings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117931 - 2015-01-20
Certification
for interference with custody of children. There, we stated that withholding custody of a child “addresses
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73854 - 2011-11-15
for interference with custody of children. There, we stated that withholding custody of a child “addresses
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73854 - 2011-11-15
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2010AP2514-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2008CF120
for interference with custody of children. There, we stated that withholding custody of a child “addresses
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73854 - 2014-09-15
for interference with custody of children. There, we stated that withholding custody of a child “addresses
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73854 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in this case “from the time he was in custody on an extended supervision hold” on April 24, 2020,2 until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813552 - 2024-06-18
in this case “from the time he was in custody on an extended supervision hold” on April 24, 2020,2 until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813552 - 2024-06-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in this case “from the time he was in custody on an extended supervision hold” on April 24, 2020,2 until
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813552 - 2024-06-18
in this case “from the time he was in custody on an extended supervision hold” on April 24, 2020,2 until
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813552 - 2024-06-18
[PDF]
State v. Ricky Jones
of Jones’s motion seeking a hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. However, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13657 - 2017-09-21
of Jones’s motion seeking a hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. However, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13657 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ricky Jones
prison sentence. We affirm the trial court’s rejection of Jones’s motion seeking a hearing on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13657 - 2005-03-31
prison sentence. We affirm the trial court’s rejection of Jones’s motion seeking a hearing on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13657 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
The referee issued his report on February 13, 2014. Attorney Din filed a motion for reconsideration
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133438 - 2015-01-21
The referee issued his report on February 13, 2014. Attorney Din filed a motion for reconsideration
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133438 - 2015-01-21