Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6801 - 6810 of 16230 for search.
Search results 6801 - 6810 of 16230 for search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
right to be free from an unreasonable search. This is the same question recently addressed by our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248776 - 2019-10-17
right to be free from an unreasonable search. This is the same question recently addressed by our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248776 - 2019-10-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2 Arizona v. Gant, 129 S. Ct. 1710, 1716-19 (2009) (search of the passenger compartment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66183 - 2014-09-15
. 2 Arizona v. Gant, 129 S. Ct. 1710, 1716-19 (2009) (search of the passenger compartment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66183 - 2014-09-15
State v. Brad A. Peterson
would lack arguable merit. In his response, Peterson raises: (1) a challenge to the search and seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11888 - 2005-03-31
would lack arguable merit. In his response, Peterson raises: (1) a challenge to the search and seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11888 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
—with the handler—the evaluation or search of the vehicle, that there was some discussion with the officer—Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107042 - 2017-09-21
—with the handler—the evaluation or search of the vehicle, that there was some discussion with the officer—Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107042 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
unreasonable searches and seizures, and an investigative stop is a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39047 - 2009-08-05
unreasonable searches and seizures, and an investigative stop is a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39047 - 2009-08-05
State v. Brad A. Peterson
would lack arguable merit. In his response, Peterson raises: (1) a challenge to the search and seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11887 - 2005-03-31
would lack arguable merit. In his response, Peterson raises: (1) a challenge to the search and seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11887 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
—with the handler—the evaluation or search of the vehicle, that there was some discussion with the officer—Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107042 - 2014-01-21
—with the handler—the evaluation or search of the vehicle, that there was some discussion with the officer—Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107042 - 2014-01-21
[PDF]
Russell W. Weber v. Terrence M. Crossin
). The appellate court will search the record for evidence to support the trial court's findings of fact. In re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15503 - 2017-09-21
). The appellate court will search the record for evidence to support the trial court's findings of fact. In re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15503 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
searched the vehicle and found an Arkansas title for an F-250 truck Knudson had purchased two months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35343 - 2009-01-26
searched the vehicle and found an Arkansas title for an F-250 truck Knudson had purchased two months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35343 - 2009-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that night. Vis then placed LaFever under arrest and obtained a search warrant for LaFever’s blood, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249376 - 2019-10-30
that night. Vis then placed LaFever under arrest and obtained a search warrant for LaFever’s blood, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249376 - 2019-10-30