Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6811 - 6820 of 68502 for did.
Search results 6811 - 6820 of 68502 for did.
State v. William Faison
phrase. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12576 - 2005-03-31
phrase. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12576 - 2005-03-31
Walter H. Osswald v. Jack Osswald
and Laverne, essentially expressed their desire and willingness to accept Jack’s offer. Although Jack did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18867 - 2005-07-05
and Laverne, essentially expressed their desire and willingness to accept Jack’s offer. Although Jack did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18867 - 2005-07-05
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
not impose a sentence to run consecutive to a future sentence, the trial court did not do that. Indeed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
not impose a sentence to run consecutive to a future sentence, the trial court did not do that. Indeed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
program now.” Defense counsel did not correct or clarify any of Holifield’s responses. At the guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27498 - 2006-12-18
program now.” Defense counsel did not correct or clarify any of Holifield’s responses. At the guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27498 - 2006-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
home in the next nine months?” Debra’s trial counsel did not object to the testimony. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99612 - 2014-09-15
home in the next nine months?” Debra’s trial counsel did not object to the testimony. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99612 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and heard arguments from the parties. The court determined that the facts alleged by Grogan did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267975 - 2020-07-09
and heard arguments from the parties. The court determined that the facts alleged by Grogan did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267975 - 2020-07-09
State v. Gregory M. Davis
to explain the actions he took, and this incident was the type for which he would document what he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11438 - 2005-03-31
to explain the actions he took, and this incident was the type for which he would document what he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11438 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
police about the accident, Geyer replied No. 2014AP2625-CR 3 “that he did not know he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140332 - 2017-09-21
police about the accident, Geyer replied No. 2014AP2625-CR 3 “that he did not know he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140332 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
of the record indicates that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying McClellan's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8138 - 2017-09-19
of the record indicates that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying McClellan's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8138 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
of the record indicates that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying McClellan's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8227 - 2017-09-19
of the record indicates that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying McClellan's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8227 - 2017-09-19