Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6811 - 6820 of 24429 for extending.
Search results 6811 - 6820 of 24429 for extending.
COURT OF APPEALS
, “several years” in prison followed by a lengthy period of extended supervision. The circuit court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114894 - 2014-06-23
, “several years” in prison followed by a lengthy period of extended supervision. The circuit court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114894 - 2014-06-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision, arguing that the facts of the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123862 - 2017-09-21
of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision, arguing that the facts of the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123862 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
incarceration and five years of extended supervision on the repeated sexual assault of a child count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258871 - 2020-04-28
incarceration and five years of extended supervision on the repeated sexual assault of a child count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258871 - 2020-04-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel’s recommendation of ten years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. Out
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131327 - 2017-09-21
counsel’s recommendation of ten years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. Out
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131327 - 2017-09-21
State v. Cleveland Brown
a five-year sentence comprised of one year of initial confinement followed by four years of extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19345 - 2005-08-22
a five-year sentence comprised of one year of initial confinement followed by four years of extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19345 - 2005-08-22
COURT OF APPEALS
to one year and six months of initial confinement and six months of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32166 - 2008-03-25
to one year and six months of initial confinement and six months of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32166 - 2008-03-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, not the officers. ¶9 Hudson’s contention that the dog sniff unlawfully prolonged or extended the initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194107 - 2017-09-21
, not the officers. ¶9 Hudson’s contention that the dog sniff unlawfully prolonged or extended the initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194107 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with her parents or with other extended family members and whether it would be harmful to her to sever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222917 - 2018-10-23
with her parents or with other extended family members and whether it would be harmful to her to sever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222917 - 2018-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of extended supervision. Hamann filed a postconviction motion that the court denied. All of Hamann’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209455 - 2018-03-08
of extended supervision. Hamann filed a postconviction motion that the court denied. All of Hamann’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209455 - 2018-03-08
Waushara Co. Department of Health and Family Services v. Michael M.
DYKMAN, P.J.[1] Michael M. appeals from two orders extending two dispositional orders in CHIPS cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15712 - 2005-03-31
DYKMAN, P.J.[1] Michael M. appeals from two orders extending two dispositional orders in CHIPS cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15712 - 2005-03-31