Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6811 - 6820 of 12879 for se.
Search results 6811 - 6820 of 12879 for se.
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Lamont E. Moore, pro se, appeals from an order denying a motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28958 - 2007-06-26
PER CURIAM. Lamont E. Moore, pro se, appeals from an order denying a motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28958 - 2007-06-26
State v. Delbert L. Manke
photocopies of the documents this pro se inmate requests and given them to him, the matter would have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9398 - 2005-03-31
photocopies of the documents this pro se inmate requests and given them to him, the matter would have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9398 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals pro se from a judgment of conviction for operating while under the influence (OWI), third offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56705 - 2010-11-16
appeals pro se from a judgment of conviction for operating while under the influence (OWI), third offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56705 - 2010-11-16
[PDF]
State v. Jarrell E. Hurley
Anderson, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jarrell E. Hurley appeals pro se from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18691 - 2017-09-21
Anderson, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jarrell E. Hurley appeals pro se from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18691 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and installation of a heater in fulfillment of a contract agreement with Godfrey. Godfrey, arguing pro se, claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56955 - 2010-11-23
and installation of a heater in fulfillment of a contract agreement with Godfrey. Godfrey, arguing pro se, claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56955 - 2010-11-23
[PDF]
State v. Amado Saldana, Jr.
. The 1 Saldana also filed a pro se brief. The brief is not authorized by RULE 809.19, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14216 - 2014-09-15
. The 1 Saldana also filed a pro se brief. The brief is not authorized by RULE 809.19, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14216 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and Jacques.[2] In this pro se appeal, Jacques contends that the State withheld exculpatory evidence, namely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60845 - 2011-03-09
and Jacques.[2] In this pro se appeal, Jacques contends that the State withheld exculpatory evidence, namely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60845 - 2011-03-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J. 1 John Joseph Miller, pro se, appeals the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161811 - 2017-09-21
, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J. 1 John Joseph Miller, pro se, appeals the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161811 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Reginald M. Clytus, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97896 - 2014-09-15
. Reginald M. Clytus, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97896 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for Milwaukee County: PAUL R. VAN GRUNSVEN, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. Timothy Laur, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84917 - 2014-09-15
for Milwaukee County: PAUL R. VAN GRUNSVEN, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. Timothy Laur, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84917 - 2014-09-15