Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 68111 - 68120 of 83429 for case codes/1000.
Search results 68111 - 68120 of 83429 for case codes/1000.
State v. Shaker Alkhalidi
and their recollections were consistent and credible. In a case strikingly similar to the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13068 - 2005-03-31
and their recollections were consistent and credible. In a case strikingly similar to the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13068 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case. See generally State v. Gallion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109866 - 2017-09-21
the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case. See generally State v. Gallion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109866 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jesse J. C.
was not negligent in seeking to discover them; (3) the recantations were material to an issue in the case; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2743 - 2017-09-19
was not negligent in seeking to discover them; (3) the recantations were material to an issue in the case; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2743 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Green County Human Services v. Jennifer S.Q.
cases). ¶6 The children’s guardian ad litem doesn’t argue the point, other than to assert, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15235 - 2017-09-21
cases). ¶6 The children’s guardian ad litem doesn’t argue the point, other than to assert, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15235 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable police officer, in light of his or No. 2020AP489-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285364 - 2020-09-09
the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable police officer, in light of his or No. 2020AP489-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285364 - 2020-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not deprived of free will for making choices about how to proceed in his case. He was aware of his choices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=686135 - 2023-08-03
was not deprived of free will for making choices about how to proceed in his case. He was aware of his choices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=686135 - 2023-08-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
that their testimony would have undermined the State’s case against him. ¶5 We conclude that Earl fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53150 - 2014-09-15
that their testimony would have undermined the State’s case against him. ¶5 We conclude that Earl fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53150 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude No. 2018AP1386-CR 2 at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247394 - 2019-09-23
conclude No. 2018AP1386-CR 2 at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247394 - 2019-09-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the Secretary issued her final decision dismissing complaint OSCI-2018-12461. Turner relies on case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=383243 - 2021-07-01
the Secretary issued her final decision dismissing complaint OSCI-2018-12461. Turner relies on case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=383243 - 2021-07-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23