Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6821 - 6830 of 68502 for did.
Search results 6821 - 6830 of 68502 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court did not comply with its sentencing obligations. The record does not support his position
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56439 - 2010-11-08
that the circuit court did not comply with its sentencing obligations. The record does not support his position
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56439 - 2010-11-08
[PDF]
Michelle L. Peters v. Joseph A. Peters
of Triple P, Inc.’s, 1996 through 1999 tax returns. He did not request access to the company books. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3909 - 2017-09-20
of Triple P, Inc.’s, 1996 through 1999 tax returns. He did not request access to the company books. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3909 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Joseph E. Sabol v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
of the Wisconsin Personnel Commission that the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire (UWEC) did not unlawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7211 - 2017-09-20
of the Wisconsin Personnel Commission that the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire (UWEC) did not unlawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7211 - 2017-09-20
State v. William Faison
phrase. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12576 - 2005-03-31
phrase. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12576 - 2005-03-31
Walter H. Osswald v. Jack Osswald
and Laverne, essentially expressed their desire and willingness to accept Jack’s offer. Although Jack did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18867 - 2005-07-05
and Laverne, essentially expressed their desire and willingness to accept Jack’s offer. Although Jack did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18867 - 2005-07-05
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
not impose a sentence to run consecutive to a future sentence, the trial court did not do that. Indeed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
not impose a sentence to run consecutive to a future sentence, the trial court did not do that. Indeed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
program now.” Defense counsel did not correct or clarify any of Holifield’s responses. At the guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27498 - 2006-12-18
program now.” Defense counsel did not correct or clarify any of Holifield’s responses. At the guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27498 - 2006-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
home in the next nine months?” Debra’s trial counsel did not object to the testimony. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99612 - 2014-09-15
home in the next nine months?” Debra’s trial counsel did not object to the testimony. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99612 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and heard arguments from the parties. The court determined that the facts alleged by Grogan did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267975 - 2020-07-09
and heard arguments from the parties. The court determined that the facts alleged by Grogan did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267975 - 2020-07-09
State v. Gregory M. Davis
to explain the actions he took, and this incident was the type for which he would document what he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11438 - 2005-03-31
to explain the actions he took, and this incident was the type for which he would document what he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11438 - 2005-03-31