Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6821 - 6830 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 6821 - 6830 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also extends to the curtilage of a home. Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170, 180 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88804 - 2014-09-15
also extends to the curtilage of a home. Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170, 180 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88804 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision with 764 days of sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502390 - 2022-04-05
years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision with 764 days of sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502390 - 2022-04-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision plus one year in jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529907 - 2022-06-08
years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision plus one year in jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529907 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. It also ordered thirty-six
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165439 - 2017-09-21
years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. It also ordered thirty-six
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165439 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on November 29, 2017. Further, appellants’ motion to reconsider did not extend the appeal window. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217670 - 2018-08-15
on November 29, 2017. Further, appellants’ motion to reconsider did not extend the appeal window. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217670 - 2018-08-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
asks the court to extend or terminate the appointment or reappointment. See id. Here, Schwefel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99716 - 2014-09-15
asks the court to extend or terminate the appointment or reappointment. See id. Here, Schwefel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99716 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to two years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. After that sentence was imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34268 - 2008-10-14
to two years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. After that sentence was imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34268 - 2008-10-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision). In fashioning the sentence, the court considered the seriousness of the offense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150939 - 2017-09-21
of extended supervision). In fashioning the sentence, the court considered the seriousness of the offense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150939 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement. The court sentenced Hart to six years of initial confinement and four years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214174 - 2018-06-11
confinement. The court sentenced Hart to six years of initial confinement and four years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214174 - 2018-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
period of extended supervision. The trial court imposed concurrent sentences of ten and five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36522 - 2009-05-18
period of extended supervision. The trial court imposed concurrent sentences of ten and five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36522 - 2009-05-18