Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6821 - 6830 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 6821 - 6830 of 24568 for extending.
State v. Sean W. Ottman
which is in whole or in part the result of a probation, extended supervision or parole hold under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15975 - 2005-03-31
which is in whole or in part the result of a probation, extended supervision or parole hold under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15975 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
totaling nine years’ initial confinement and nine years’ extended supervision. However, it called
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147197 - 2015-08-23
totaling nine years’ initial confinement and nine years’ extended supervision. However, it called
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147197 - 2015-08-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 11, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Ap...
of initial confinement and extended supervision. Appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39274 - 2009-08-10
of initial confinement and extended supervision. Appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39274 - 2009-08-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BISKUPIC, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 HRUZ, J.1 Lauren2 appeals from an order extending her involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422646 - 2021-09-08
. BISKUPIC, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 HRUZ, J.1 Lauren2 appeals from an order extending her involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422646 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also extends to the curtilage of a home. Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170, 180 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88804 - 2014-09-15
also extends to the curtilage of a home. Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170, 180 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88804 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision with 764 days of sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502390 - 2022-04-05
years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision with 764 days of sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502390 - 2022-04-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision plus one year in jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529907 - 2022-06-08
years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision plus one year in jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529907 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
County of Rusk v. Eugene A. Ringhand
on in Section 29 only. ¶3 There is a strip of land that abuts the old highway right-of-way and extends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6959 - 2017-09-20
on in Section 29 only. ¶3 There is a strip of land that abuts the old highway right-of-way and extends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6959 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. It also ordered thirty-six
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165439 - 2017-09-21
years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. It also ordered thirty-six
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165439 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on November 29, 2017. Further, appellants’ motion to reconsider did not extend the appeal window. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217670 - 2018-08-15
on November 29, 2017. Further, appellants’ motion to reconsider did not extend the appeal window. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217670 - 2018-08-15