Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6831 - 6840 of 57307 for id.
Search results 6831 - 6840 of 57307 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 317. “As the statute clearly states, ‘[a] search warrant is an order.’” Id. (quoting WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75120 - 2014-09-15
N.W.2d 317. “As the statute clearly states, ‘[a] search warrant is an order.’” Id. (quoting WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75120 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not be used to review issues which were or could have been litigated on direct appeal.” Id. at 172
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141618 - 2017-09-21
not be used to review issues which were or could have been litigated on direct appeal.” Id. at 172
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141618 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was exercised “on the basis of clearly irrelevant or improper factors.” Id. When the exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831484 - 2024-07-30
was exercised “on the basis of clearly irrelevant or improper factors.” Id. When the exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831484 - 2024-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the linguistic and legal waters with our mixing of distinctly different concepts.” Id., ¶9. Specifically, “[i
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532036 - 2022-06-14
the linguistic and legal waters with our mixing of distinctly different concepts.” Id., ¶9. Specifically, “[i
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532036 - 2022-06-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or omissions “fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.” Id. at 688. To prove prejudice, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
or omissions “fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.” Id. at 688. To prove prejudice, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
Nagawicka Bay Sailing Club Owners Association, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
. App. 1996). Review of an agency’s decision is confined to the record. See id. The reviewing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11499 - 2005-03-31
. App. 1996). Review of an agency’s decision is confined to the record. See id. The reviewing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11499 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
looking beyond such language to ascertain its meaning. Id at 163. We give deference to the policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173624 - 2017-09-21
looking beyond such language to ascertain its meaning. Id at 163. We give deference to the policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173624 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and lay comprehension.” Id., ¶63 (quoted source omitted); Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=626060 - 2023-02-23
and lay comprehension.” Id., ¶63 (quoted source omitted); Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=626060 - 2023-02-23
State v. Levi Booth
,’” id. at 51, provided that the court take precautions to exclude the jury of one defendant from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4234 - 2013-09-16
,’” id. at 51, provided that the court take precautions to exclude the jury of one defendant from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4234 - 2013-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
, misled the jury or communicated an incorrect statement of the law.” Id. It is within our discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81532 - 2012-04-30
, misled the jury or communicated an incorrect statement of the law.” Id. It is within our discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81532 - 2012-04-30