Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6841 - 6850 of 29977 for consulta de causas.

COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d 676
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76458 - 2012-01-11

[PDF] Clearpointe Capital, Inc. v. Rickey Townsend
de novo. Eternalist Found., Inc. v. City of Platteville, 225 Wis. 2d 759, 769-70, 593 N.W.2d 84
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6552 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶26.[2] ¶8 Reggs argues that an affidavit he submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116050 - 2014-07-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
orders entered in connection with his three cases. We decide de novo whether an involuntary medication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850383 - 2024-09-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
existed is a question of Nos. 2024AP1540-CR 2024AP1541-CR 7 law this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936846 - 2025-04-09

State v. Tabitha A. Sherry
investigatory stop is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Williams, 2001 WI 21, ¶18, 241 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6572 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Harris D. Byers
added.) ¶16 Statutory construction presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15994 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Linda Kallas as Guardian for Ruth M. Radtke v.
An appeal from a grant of summary judgment raises an issue of law that we review de novo. 2 Van Erden v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5707 - 2017-09-19

State v. Michael D. Lewis
of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7085 - 2005-03-31

WI App 158 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2789 Complete Title o...
the issue de novo because Wiley challenges the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, see, e.g., Tews v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74073 - 2011-12-13