Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6841 - 6850 of 68466 for did.
Search results 6841 - 6850 of 68466 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not testify. His aunt and his cousin both testified that Jennifer went into the room
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86078 - 2014-09-15
did not testify. His aunt and his cousin both testified that Jennifer went into the room
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86078 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
completed a fourth grade health unit. At that time, she confronted Gallentine, and asked him “why he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57805 - 2010-12-13
completed a fourth grade health unit. At that time, she confronted Gallentine, and asked him “why he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57805 - 2010-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude the trial court did not err, and we affirm the judgment. ¶2 During the jury’s deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123060 - 2014-10-06
conclude the trial court did not err, and we affirm the judgment. ¶2 During the jury’s deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123060 - 2014-10-06
Paul G. Walker v. Eau Claire County Child Support Agency
detriment. We disagree and affirm because Walker did not reasonably rely on Purvis’s actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15052 - 2005-03-31
detriment. We disagree and affirm because Walker did not reasonably rely on Purvis’s actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15052 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Paul G. Walker v. Eau Claire County Child Support Agency
he reasonably relied to his detriment. We disagree and affirm because Walker did not reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15052 - 2017-09-21
he reasonably relied to his detriment. We disagree and affirm because Walker did not reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15052 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bradley Brownlee
Wardell was asked if she consented, although he believed she was. He also testified that he did not ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8462 - 2017-09-19
Wardell was asked if she consented, although he believed she was. He also testified that he did not ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8462 - 2017-09-19
State v. David Gallagher
, Gallagher contends that he was not advised of and did not understand the elements of the offense. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4527 - 2005-03-31
, Gallagher contends that he was not advised of and did not understand the elements of the offense. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4527 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James A. Newson
that he was actually in possession of the cocaine. Because the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7322 - 2017-09-20
that he was actually in possession of the cocaine. Because the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7322 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and bats were trying to kill him.” The bailiff said he did not observe anything Upthegrove described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199863 - 2017-11-01
and bats were trying to kill him.” The bailiff said he did not observe anything Upthegrove described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199863 - 2017-11-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for a mistrial based on juror bias. We conclude the trial court did not err, and we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123060 - 2014-10-07
motion for a mistrial based on juror bias. We conclude the trial court did not err, and we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123060 - 2014-10-07