Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6841 - 6850 of 73419 for has.

State v. Oto Orlik
., the court has authority to set conditions on the release of a defendant pending trial, but does not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14570 - 2005-03-31

Marlene Brown v. David G. Dibbell, M.D.
has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body ….” Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12800 - 2005-03-31

Town of Sheboygan v. City of Sheboygan
and/or duplicating the water public utility service in the subject area until such time that the commission has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9315 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dennis R. Thiel
in relevant part: (1) If a person has been committed under s. 980.06 and has not been discharged under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2156 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] North American Mechanical, Inc. v. Diocese of Madison
was not unionized. Thus, although each of NAMI’s causes of action has different elements, NAMI’s claims rise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14781 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Mai X.
and school programs. Mai has no prior delinquency findings and no prior referrals to the department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10842 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Kenneth P. Sarauer
corpus relief and immediate release from prison. He has completed his prison sentence and therefore we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6136 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 29, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Ap...
or dismissal is pursuant to statute. The State asserts that the district attorney has discretion in choosing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30082 - 2007-08-28

2009 WI APP 84
of admission, and with the court immediately thereafter. The filing of the statement has the same effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36553 - 2011-02-07

State v. George F. Passarelli
.” This court has no authority to review the personal notes of the defendant or of his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13819 - 2005-03-31