Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 68451 - 68460 of 83434 for case codes/1000.
Search results 68451 - 68460 of 83434 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
Tamara R. DeVares v. Barney W. DeVares
that the initial ruling was not final. We disagree. “The test of finality is not what later happened in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14722 - 2017-09-21
that the initial ruling was not final. We disagree. “The test of finality is not what later happened in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14722 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, this court’s role “is not to retry the case, but rather to determine whether the trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707799 - 2023-09-27
, this court’s role “is not to retry the case, but rather to determine whether the trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707799 - 2023-09-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for, and denied being part of, the incident. Christmas eventually agreed to resolve his case through a plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199796 - 2017-10-27
for, and denied being part of, the incident. Christmas eventually agreed to resolve his case through a plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199796 - 2017-10-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The State points to eight factors that it believes justified an extension of the stop in this case: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109597 - 2017-09-21
The State points to eight factors that it believes justified an extension of the stop in this case: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109597 - 2017-09-21
Douglas County v. Steven Leinweber
the “totality of the circumstances.” Id. at 139-40. ¶7 In this case the two-step standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2225 - 2005-03-31
the “totality of the circumstances.” Id. at 139-40. ¶7 In this case the two-step standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2225 - 2005-03-31
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82212 - 2012-05-03
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82212 - 2012-05-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448141 - 2021-11-03
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448141 - 2021-11-03
[PDF]
Natalie Baker v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of an unemployment compensation case, we review the decision of LIRC, not that of the circuit court. Stafford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11929 - 2017-09-21
of an unemployment compensation case, we review the decision of LIRC, not that of the circuit court. Stafford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11929 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Jefferson v. Steven P. Fleming
578, 484 N.W.2d 347 (Ct. App. 1992). He asserts that in each of these cases, the court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11593 - 2017-09-19
578, 484 N.W.2d 347 (Ct. App. 1992). He asserts that in each of these cases, the court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11593 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Blalock, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514, 520 (Ct. App. 1989) (cases should be decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60798 - 2014-09-15
. Blalock, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514, 520 (Ct. App. 1989) (cases should be decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60798 - 2014-09-15