Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 68461 - 68470 of 75201 for public records.
Search results 68461 - 68470 of 75201 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
action against Schmidt. Based upon No. 2023AP323 2 our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739106 - 2023-12-13
action against Schmidt. Based upon No. 2023AP323 2 our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739106 - 2023-12-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2024AP2036 2 conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1093174 - 2026-03-25
of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2024AP2036 2 conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1093174 - 2026-03-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference No. 2019AP1001 2 that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449587 - 2021-11-09
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference No. 2019AP1001 2 that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449587 - 2021-11-09
CA Blank Order
denying his postconviction motions. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124783 - 2014-10-16
denying his postconviction motions. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124783 - 2014-10-16
Robert J. Probst v. Winnebago County
.2d 48, 49 (Ct. App. 1994). We independently examine the record to determine whether any genuine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13639 - 2005-03-31
.2d 48, 49 (Ct. App. 1994). We independently examine the record to determine whether any genuine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13639 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶10 On this record, drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of Bacovsky, we conclude that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243443 - 2019-07-17
. ¶10 On this record, drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of Bacovsky, we conclude that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243443 - 2019-07-17
[PDF]
State v. Steven Curtes
the record to find additional facts to support the trial court’s decision. NO. 96-3458-CR 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11784 - 2017-09-20
the record to find additional facts to support the trial court’s decision. NO. 96-3458-CR 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11784 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jeremy A. Heisz
decision, we will independently review the record to determine whether there is any reasonable basis upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7259 - 2005-03-31
decision, we will independently review the record to determine whether there is any reasonable basis upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7259 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114229 - 2026-05-05
denying his motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114229 - 2026-05-05
[PDF]
Steven R. Franke v. Universal Surety Company
inadequate to support the court’s discretionary decision. The record contains no evidence that the Florida
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14798 - 2017-09-21
inadequate to support the court’s discretionary decision. The record contains no evidence that the Florida
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14798 - 2017-09-21