Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6851 - 6860 of 15278 for 2013.
Search results 6851 - 6860 of 15278 for 2013.
COURT OF APPEALS
. By order dated March 13, 2013, we explained that we only had jurisdiction to review the October order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107616 - 2014-02-03
. By order dated March 13, 2013, we explained that we only had jurisdiction to review the October order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107616 - 2014-02-03
COURT OF APPEALS
each full force and effect.’” See Westra v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2013 WI App 93, ¶10, 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144520 - 2015-07-15
each full force and effect.’” See Westra v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2013 WI App 93, ¶10, 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144520 - 2015-07-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. See State v. Starks, 2013 WI 69, ¶47, 349 Wis. 2d 274, 833 N.W.2d 146. No. 2012AP1192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121267 - 2014-09-15
motion. See State v. Starks, 2013 WI 69, ¶47, 349 Wis. 2d 274, 833 N.W.2d 146. No. 2012AP1192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121267 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to be calculated under the presumptive statutory amount in Wis. Stat. § 102.11(1)(g) (2013-14),[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135731 - 2015-02-25
to be calculated under the presumptive statutory amount in Wis. Stat. § 102.11(1)(g) (2013-14),[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135731 - 2015-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
for the court’s ruling. Id. ¶7 Wisconsin Stat. § 904.04(2)(a) (2013-14)[1] prohibits the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135733 - 2015-02-25
for the court’s ruling. Id. ¶7 Wisconsin Stat. § 904.04(2)(a) (2013-14)[1] prohibits the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135733 - 2015-02-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Facsimile (608) 267-0640 Web Site: www.wicourts.gov DISTRICT I September 12, 2013
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101988 - 2017-09-21
Facsimile (608) 267-0640 Web Site: www.wicourts.gov DISTRICT I September 12, 2013
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101988 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶7 WISCONSIN STAT. § 904.04(2)(a) (2013-14) 1 prohibits the admission of “evidence of other crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135733 - 2017-09-21
¶7 WISCONSIN STAT. § 904.04(2)(a) (2013-14) 1 prohibits the admission of “evidence of other crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135733 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(2013) (“An appellate court need not address every issue raised by the parties when one issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546719 - 2022-08-01
(2013) (“An appellate court need not address every issue raised by the parties when one issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546719 - 2022-08-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2013, we granted the State’s petition for leave to appeal the trial court’s nonfinal order under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108889 - 2017-09-21
, 2013, we granted the State’s petition for leave to appeal the trial court’s nonfinal order under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108889 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 940.19(2), (6) (2013-14), 1 939.63(1)(b), 973.055(1), 968.075(1)(a). In case No. 2014CF4351
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212045 - 2018-05-01
. §§ 940.19(2), (6) (2013-14), 1 939.63(1)(b), 973.055(1), 968.075(1)(a). In case No. 2014CF4351
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212045 - 2018-05-01